I recently read Blert by Jordan Scott. I have to say my first impression was one of confusion and a general feeling of "meh." I painfully flipped through each page, trying my best to keep an open mind and to try and understand what this poetry was working so hard to describe. I got lost in the overuse of random words and exaggerated sentences. It wasn't until we discussed the book in class that I truly developed an appreciation for this collection. I was never blessed with a speech impediment that helped produce such an impactful collection, so I feel lucky to be able to read, and now understand, what's been put in front of me. Upon a second reading, this time with an understanding that this book was intentionally made difficult to follow which mirrors the difficulty the author finds in speaking, I was much more attracted to the contents of the book. While doing a little more research into this text, I stumbled upon a review in Lemon Hound. Here's the link: http://lemonhound.blogspot.ca/2008/08/derek-beaulieu-on-blert.html
I think Derek Beaulieu does a great job exploring and explaining his feelings on the text, and I felt like I more or less agreed with him. I found a lot of truth in Derek's explanation of the collection as a whole:
I really enjoy the use of interesting word combinations and sounds, but like you, I was confused by what the poems were actually about. This is another circumstance where I feel it helps to know a thing or two about the author and where they stand. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and that Lemon Hound article. I agree, it helps explain a lot.
ReplyDelete